About this Entry
Posted by: dannwigner

Visit dannwigner's Xanga Site

Original: 6/16/2009 9:23 PM
Views: 103
Comments: 5
eProps: 2

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
canicus


Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Mystic Mondays (on Tuesday) -- Senses of Scripture

 

At this point, I should perhaps give in to my fate and entitle this weekly segment, "Mystic Tuesdays," since I usually don't have time until Tuesday evenings to post. However, I think that I will doggedly adhere to my alliteration for another week or two.

Following the definition of last week, I wanted to treat a subject that is more practical, and, probably, quite common -- reading the Bible. I know, I know -- you're going to say -- only mystics read the Bible! Normal people should never be allowed to try and read it for themselves : )

Well, with all kidding aside, the reading of Scripture is at the heart of many mystical practices, and the evangelical stress on a "quiet time" of Bible reading is one of the vestiges of mystical practices that made it across the divide of the Protestant Reformation. However, in the Christian mystical tradition, reading the Bible is a more circumspect process than is generally practiced today. In fact, there are four senses in which Scripture should be read.

1. The Literal Sense -- If you read a good commentary or are familiar with the "historical-critical" method, then you have some familarity with the literal sense of Scripture. In short, it is reading a passage(s) in the Bible with the intent to understand what it meant to the original audience that read/experienced it. Now, this sense can be more involved than some think. The literal sense is not what one thinks the Bible means when it is just read plainly; rather, it is what a passage or story actually means -- which entails taking into account historical context, authorial intent, linguistic criteria, etc. Understanding what the Bible "literally" means is not always easy; otherwise, biblical commentaries would not be so big!

2. The Allegorical Sense -- I won't define allegory for you, but, if you are unsure of what it means, then follow this link (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/allegory). Let's suffice it to say that the allegorical sense of Scripture involves reading a passage, discerning the principles present within it, then applying those principles to your present circumstances or the larger circumstances of history. Now, as a word of caution, some interpreters can take this sense too far. In fact, some mystics interpreted minute facts of a biblical passage to apply to a very, very specific instance that they themselves were experiencing at the time.While this sense of Scripture is generally still present, it is often referred to as "application" these days. Pastors practice allegorical interpretation all the time. When they offer an interesting anecdote which fits into their sermon in order to engage the interest of a congregation, they are allegorizing. This sense is very useful in many ways, because it forces one to see the abstract principles behind actions and then translating those principles into a different actions, narratives, or personal experiences. As such, the allegorical sense can assist the moral sense which we will consider in a bit.

3. The Spiritual (Anagogic) Sense -- In this sense of Scripture, one takes seriously that God can speak through the Bible straight to you. The Bible is a means to meet God. This sense is different from all the others, because a person does not have any control of it. For lack of a better way of saying it, God hits you with this sense whenever he wants! Sometimes, this "contemplative moment" may be manifest simply as a passage making sense to you in a way that it hasn't before -- it stands out -- it "shimmers" now where you just read over it before. Sometimes, this moment could be more intense, and mystical texts are replete with experiences that go beyond our normal everyday experience to visions and dreams. Suffice it to say, this sense occurs during those times when the Bible ceases to be a book and becomes a means by which the Word of God speaks to you. While this may seem to be the "highest" sense of Scripture, the "contemplative moment" is useless if one only remains in the moment.

4. The Moral Sense -- I should note at this point is where I differ with other scholars and mystics in this area. I tend to place the moral sense as the highest sense (most place it as second) -- not because it is the most difficult to understand but it is the sense which goes beyond understanding to action. It also should be the end result of what is gained through the other three senses. With that said, the moral sense is simple and abominably difficult at the same time. To read Scripture morally, one should pray, "God, what should I do in response to what you have done." Now, the hard part is actually doing what God shows you. The mystic who doesn't care for his/her fellow man has missed a vital revelation of the nature of God. 

Application: So, what?

Well, I'd like to challenge you to try and read Scripture in its different senses this week. Pick a passage of Scripture (and it doesn't need to be a long one), and read it through four times, according to each sense. For the literal sense, read a passage, and maybe pick up a commentary that deals with the historical background. For the allegorical sense, read a passage, write down what you think its basic "principles" are, then try and apply these principles to your own experience (or for a bigger challenge -- apply them to the larger situation of your church, city, state, or country). For the spiritual sense, well, you can't just "activate" this sense on a whim; however, try to read a passage and listen rather than think - this practice doesn't guarantee a "contemplative moment," but it "greases the wheels" so to speak. It helps you to get used to expecting God to speak. For the moral sense, read a passage while you pray the prayer written above -- then live ethically.

 Posted 6/16/2009 9:23 PM - 103 Views - 2 eProps - 5 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

5 Comments

Visit canicus's Xanga Site!
"Anagogic" can also refer to reading the Scripture eschatologically, whether about the Second Coming, one's own death, the Final Judgment, or any other eschatological sense.

Another method is typological. It's not quite allegorical. For instance, if I were to say that Jesus' (Joshua's) conquest of Canaan prefigures the Jesus' conquest of death, then I would be using typology, because it's not really allegory.

There are actually a couple of others as well, but they aren't as important :).
Posted 6/17/2009 2:07 AM by online now canicus - reply

Visit dannwigner's Xanga Site!

Kenneth,


Yes, anagogic can be eschatological, in the same way that a vision can be eschatological; however, that is not the primary sense of anagogic. Also, I'm afraid that you're viewing "allegorical" a little too narrowly -- typology does fit within it as far as the senses of Scripture are concerned. So, not quite right, but I'm glad that you're showing interest in the mystical side of things.


Yes, there are a few others, but they are sub-types of these main senses of Scripture.

Posted 6/17/2009 10:22 AM by dannwigner - reply

Visit canicus's Xanga Site!

@dannwigner - 

I don't think either one of those statements are right. The "primary" sense of both depends very much on who you're using, what century you're using, and what nation they come from. Allegory, historically, has tended to denote supplying a meaning for every detail, while typology has tended to be used to denote looking at a shade of a single meaning. I am not defining it too narrowly; I am defining it by its historical limits that began to emerge around the fourth century. I use the fourth century, because the meaning was still emerging in the first (very much like the distinctions between hypostasis and physis; nobody uses them in their first century meanings).

Anagogy's primary sense, again, depends very much on who you're learning from even more so than location or time. That's because, when used in literary interpretation, the word tended to have a different inclination in the noun and the verb. I might be aware of the primary sense of Greek words ;).
Posted 6/17/2009 3:29 PM by online now canicus - reply

Visit dannwigner's Xanga Site!

Well, Kenneth, first, and most importantly, how do you get your comments to do that "@" thing?


Second, we can dance around the literal meanings of Greek words if you want, but that's not what I'm talking about with the senses of Scripture. However, since you brought up the issue of history, one can read the writings of Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Pseudo-Dionysius, Gregory the Great, Bonaventure, Richard of St. Victor, and "The Cloud of Unknowing" to follow the lines of the development (with special attention to Bonaventure) of the senses of Scripture (and the definitions of allegory and anagogy) which I'm introducing here.

Posted 6/17/2009 4:41 PM by dannwigner - reply

Visit canicus's Xanga Site!

@dannwigner - 

Under the post of a given person, there is a spot that says "reply". If you hit it, it will do your dirty work for you.

I know about a good number of those authors. That's some of the sources I've read and draw my definitions from ;).

BTW, I have Final Crisis now.
Posted 6/18/2009 2:29 AM by online now canicus - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to dannwigner's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in dannwigner's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)